![]() ![]() It would have far-reaching ramifications the next time you want someone to bring to the country”, the bench said.Īdvocate Rishi Malhotra, appearing for Salem, said that in Portugal the courts cannot award a sentence of more than 25 years, and based on the principle of reciprocity the Government of India has assured that in case Salem is extradited he would not be sentenced more than 25 years but now the TADA court has awarded life imprisonment. We understand, the offences are serious, but in your political wisdom, you made a commitment that you have to take care of it. We will ask the home secretary to file an affidavit. “You have to clarify the stand taken by the Union government. The top court added that it accepts that the offences are serious but the stand on the commitment made by the Union of India in its political wisdom should be evaluated based on the wide ramification it would have. Is the government saying that it will not stand by the international commitment?” the bench said. We have asked you to inform us whether you are going to abide by the assurance given. “Who has asked you to file an affidavit? CBI is just a prosecuting agency. List on April 12, 2022”.Īt the outset, the bench told Additional Solicitor General KM Nataraj, appearing for CBI, that it is not the affidavit of agency it had wanted to be filed. The affidavit shall be filed within a period of three weeks. Therefore, we call upon the home secretary to file an affidavit in this regard. ![]() The government has to take a stand keeping in mind the international commitment made and the ramification of it. The question is whether the assurance given by the then Deputy Prime Minister on behalf of the government of India is to be abided or not. It directed, “We are not satisfied with the reply affidavit. I just tested this script on a Jakarta and Kingston instance and it worked.A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and MM Sundresh asked the union home secretary to file an affidavit specifying whether the Government of India will abide by the solemn assurance given by then deputy Prime Minister to Portugal. Or maybe the fact that when calling a webservice from a process it uses a special linux user which then in turn gets blocked by the firewall (between PPM and ServiceNow servers)? Maybe the secure https soapEndPoint causes a problem? I really do not know what could be going wrong. However when executing the webservice call (either insert or getRecords actions) I get a connection timed out exception I have tested calling the webservice from the CA PPM 14.3 Test server command line (linux) using the instructions I found onĪnd it worked fine. I also tested using SOAPUI with no issues. I am now working on a ServiceNow integration using Basic Authentication and I tried to use your sample code. The script below calls a simple ServiceNow getRecords on the sys_user table. Being in the On-Demand environment (but not for long!), I often find myself resorting to a brute force method. Using brute force to make the soap call by using the class. Write a simple wrapper class that handles getting information from external web services and just use the invokeStatic tag in the jelly:core tag lib. This tag lib doesn’t come out of the box, so you will need to find the jar and drop it into the lib. For ServiceNow, you would need to include the Authorization header. Use the Jelly soap invokeRaw tag which allows you to define the HTTP headers via the soapAction attribute. The current invoke tag via the .SOAPTagLibrary doesn’t allow one to modify the request headers and many web service require authentication such as ServiceNow.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |